InsuranceAutonomyCosts

How Recurring Software Investigations Could Change EV/Autonomy Insurance Pricing

UUnknown

2026-02-17

9 min read

Regulatory probes into Tesla's FSD are reshaping EV and autonomy insurance. Learn how investigations will change premiums, underwriting, and ownership costs.

Why owners and buyers should care: investigations are not just headlines — they change insurance bills

Regulatory probes into advanced driver-assist and autonomous systems (most visibly the continuing Tesla FSD probe) are more than a PR headache for automakers. For car buyers and owners they can directly affect one of the largest ownership line items: insurance pricing. When safety investigations recur, insurers reassess risk, underwriters rewrite rules, and premiums or coverage terms can shift—sometimes quickly.

Top-line takeaway

Recurring software investigations create short-term volatility and long-term structural change in auto insurance. Expect more feature-level underwriting, new data-sharing requirements, evolving liability allocations between drivers and manufacturers, and price differentiation for EVs and vehicles with advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS).

The immediate context: what the Tesla FSD probe reveals about regulatory risk (late 2025–early 2026)

Late 2025 and early 2026 saw a clear uptick in regulatory scrutiny of ADAS and early autonomy. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has widened investigations that cite repeated complaints about systems ignoring red lights or crossing into oncoming traffic. In the FSD probe NHTSA requested detailed vehicle and incident data, use rates, and customer complaints—showing regulators want granular telemetry and software-version histories, not just aggregated counts.

Regulators requested lists of every vehicle with the feature, cumulative usage data, and incident reports—an indication that future underwriting will rely on OEM-provided operational datasets.

How recurring investigations affect insurance pricing — the mechanisms

Regulatory probes create pressure across several parts of the insurance value chain. Below are the most important mechanisms insurers and buyers should watch.

1. Risk reassessment and short-term premium volatility

When a model or an ADAS product becomes the subject of an investigation, underwriters re-evaluate loss projections. Investigations signal two types of risk: immediate operational risk (current software behavior that could cause crashes) and systemic or legal risk (liabilities, recalls, and fines). That can lead insurers to apply targeted surcharges or restrict coverage for vehicles running the flagged software until the risk is resolved.

2. Feature-level underwriting

Instead of pricing by make, model and trim alone, insurers will increasingly price by feature and software version. A car with a validated, certified ADAS stack may earn a lower rate than the same model running an experimental “Full Self-Driving” bucket of code. Underwriting data will expand beyond demographics and driving history to include OTA-update history, installed feature flags, and engagement metrics.

3. Liability shifts and coverage design

Partial automation blurs the line between driver and manufacturer responsibility. Recurring probes accelerate legislative and judicial clarification of who is at fault when assisted systems are active. Insurers will respond by:

Carving out or limiting coverage for incidents tied to specific software features until liability frameworks are clearer.
Designing endorsements or add-on policies that explicitly cover software and sensor failures.
Negotiating indemnity or co-insurance agreements with OEMs who choose to offer manufacturer-backed insurance.

4. Data access, telematics and underwriting accuracy

Regulators demanding OEM data sets increases the value of subscription to vehicle telemetry for insurers. Access to speed, steering input, ADAS engagement rates, and time-of-day usage allows much more granular risk models—and pricing. Insurers that secure reliable telemetry will gain an edge; those that don’t will face higher uncertainty premiums.

5. Repair costs, parts complexity and total loss thresholds

EVs already command higher repair bills for battery systems and specialized bodywork. Autonomy adds expensive sensors, lidar/camera arrays, and complex software validation after repair. Investigations tend to reveal or trigger recalls and deeper inspections; that raises claims severity and can push insurers’ combined ratios higher—usually reflected in higher premiums.

6. Residual values and depreciation

Models under prolonged investigation may suffer reputational damage that reduces resale value. Lower resale values increase the insurer’s loss on total-loss claims and can raise comprehensive and collision premiums for affected models.

How underwriting practices will evolve (practical implications)

Underwriting will move from broad actuarial tables to a hybrid of actuarial + software-risk scoring. Here’s how that materializes in practice.

Software maturity scores

Insurers will develop or license a software maturity score for ADAS/ADS systems that rates code stability, update frequency, incident history, and regulatory status. Vehicles with higher maturity scores will get preferential rates or feature-based discounts.

Dynamic pricing by software version

Expect insurers to incorporate versioning into policy language: two identical cars can have different premiums if one runs an older or investigational ADAS release. Policies may include clauses requiring owners to install manufacturer safety updates to retain discounts.

OEM-insurer partnerships

Some manufacturers will offload certain risks by offering insurance directly (or via partners). That trend will intensify. OEM-backed insurance can be priced around intimate knowledge of sensor performance, update cadence, and recall plans—but will likely come with strict usage and update requirements.

Regulatory-driven reporting requirements

As regulators demand more granular reporting, insurers will be compelled to accept and process OEM telemetry via secure pipelines (ingest, storage and analysis). That shift raises questions about data privacy, consent and cross-border data flows and the compliance architecture insurers and OEMs must adopt. For secure ingestion and processing, teams will combine hosted tunnels and resilient pipelines with scalable storage vendors.

2026 trends and predictions: what to expect from now through the next 3 years

Based on the regulatory momentum of late 2025 and early 2026, here are realistic trends and timelines:

Near term (2026): Targeted premium increases for models under active investigation; more insurers add explicit software exclusions or endorsements; growth in telematics-based discounts tied to ADAS engagement metrics.
Medium term (2027–2028): Standardized software maturity metrics appear; OEMs and insurers formalize data-sharing agreements; a small number of OEMs offer captive or co-branded insurance programs for ADAS-equipped vehicles.
Long term (2029+): Liability frameworks evolve—likely a mix of product liability for autonomous functionality and driver liability for human inputs—leading to stable, feature-based pricing models and broader adoption of OEM-backed coverage for high-level autonomy.

Concrete advice for buyers and owners (actionable checklist)

If you own, plan to buy, or insure a vehicle with advanced driver-assist or autonomy-capable features, do the following to protect yourself and your wallet:

Ask insurers about feature-level pricing: Before you buy, get insurance quotes that specify whether ADAS or autonomy features raise or lower premiums, and whether software versioning affects pricing.
Demand policy transparency: Read exclusions. Look for clauses that exclude claims when “experimental” software is active or when required updates aren’t installed.
Document OTA updates, usage, and disablement decisions; save OTA update receipts and screenshots of software versions. If you disable a feature or limit it, document that too—this can be crucial in claims or disputes.
Use telematics wisely: If your insurer offers usage-based discounts via OEM-linked telemetry, weigh the savings against privacy concerns. Choose programs that use aggregated, anonymized data where possible.
Consider supplemental coverage: Look into endorsements for sensor and software failures, or for higher limits on parts and diagnostic labor that autonomy repairs usually need.
Check resale and recall history: A vehicle involved in an extended investigation may depreciate faster—factor that into lease returns, trade-ins, and total cost of ownership calculations.

Advice for fleet managers & commercial buyers

Fleets face amplified risk because their exposure scales quickly. Practical steps:

Negotiate OEM data access and indemnity clauses in procurement contracts.
Run pilot programs with telemetry and performance KPIs before large rollouts.
Structure insurance to handle both driver and software risk—consider captive programs for large fleets.
Invest in driver training for supervised autonomy modes to reduce incidence rates and claims.

Advice for insurers and underwriters

Underwriters must modernize their toolset:

Integrate software-risk specialists into underwriting teams.
Develop or license feature-level actuarial models and software maturity scores.
Pursue partnerships with OEMs for secure telemetry; insist on audited data pipelines and resilient ingestion (hosted tunnels, reliable storage).
Revisit policy language to address product liability and software-driven failures clearly.

Three real-world scenarios — how pricing may move

Below are plausible scenarios that show how investigations can produce different outcomes for premiums and underwriting.

Scenario A — Short-term probe, swift fix

Investigations uncover a software bug; the OEM issues an OTA patch and cooperates with regulators. Losses are contained and insurer confidence is restored. Result: temporary uptick in premiums for the affected model, followed by normalization and potential discounts tied to the update.

Scenario B — Recurrent issues and legal exposure

Multiple investigations reveal systemic failures or delayed fixes. Lawsuits follow and regulators enforce recalls. Result: materially higher claims severity and legal costs push premiums up for affected models and potentially entire product lines. Insurers may require stricter endorsements or decline new policies for that software build.

Scenario C — Industry-wide regulatory standards emerge

Regulators create standardized reporting and safety certification for ADAS/ADS. OEMs comply and certification becomes a market differentiator. Result: more predictable underwriting, feature-based pricing, and lower cost volatility as certified systems gain price advantages.

What this means for EV insurance specifically

EV insurance already reflects higher repair costs, battery replacement risk and specialized body repair. Add autonomy-related complexity and you get:

Higher claims cost per incident due to expensive sensors and validation testing.
Greater sensitivity to resale value changes—important for loan and lease gap coverage.
Potential for OEM-backed insurance products that bundle software support and liability coverage.

Final, practical recommendations — what to do right now

Whether you’re buying, selling, insuring, or operating ADAS-equipped EVs, follow this three-step plan:

Compare feature-level insurance quotes before purchase and ask for written policy language about software-related claims.
Document OTA updates, usage, and disablement decisions; keep everything in one digital folder for claims or resale.
Choose partners—insurer, OEM, fleet telematics provider—who commit to transparent data-sharing and clear indemnity terms.

Closing thoughts — the road ahead

Recurring software investigations like the Tesla FSD probe are accelerating a long-overdue modernization of auto insurance. We are moving from VIN-only underwriting to a software- and usage-aware market. That transition will create winners and losers—consumers who understand feature-level risk can shop smarter, and insurers that integrate telemetry and software-risk expertise will price more accurately.

Actionable next step: If you own or plan to buy an EV with advanced driver-assist features, get feature-specific insurance quotes, maintain your software update history, and subscribe to regulatory and recall alerts for your make and model.

Unknown

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.